Tuesday, December 1, 2009
The Color Purple
The reason she was turned off by God was because she pictured him as a male and he did not answer any of her prays or helped her in her life. Shug pointed out that men ruin everything; they try to convince everyone that they are the universe and are everything. When people start to believe that they are truly everything, people start to think they are even God. She suggested that every time Celie thinks of God shaped as a man, to erase the image immediately, and keep doing that until you can think of God as everything but a man.
Monday, November 23, 2009
Fires in the Mirrors (2)
Rosyln Malamud, a Lubavitcher resident of Crown Heights really stood out to me among all the people being interviewed. She had a lot of insight on the relationship between the Jews and the African Americans living in Crown Heights. She pointed out the fact that both Jews and African Americans want the same thing out life, they want to be successful, send their kids to a good school. But the two minorities cannot get along because of their different religions and different foods. She as stated that no racial or religious groups want to kill a 7-year-old boy and kill the boy on purpose. The black community is forgetting that it was an accident because they are not thinking rationally. They are making rationally decisions (like killing an innocent Jewish bystander) because they are letting their anger take control.
The two groups are acting like typical humans in the fact that they want revenge. The black community wanted revenge on the Jewish man that killed the seven year old black boy. When they were not going to get it because the driver was going to be allowed to be free, they got their revenge by killing an innocent Jewish bystander. The bystander’s brother, Norman Rosenbaum, then wanted revenge on the black community for his brother’s death. The revenge he wanted was the man that was responsible for stabbing his brother to be locked up in jail. When that did not happen, he and the Jews did not resort to violence, but to protesting. That was the main difference between the two groups. The Jewish community did not resort to violence to get their revenge, while the black community did.
Both groups are determined to make the other group look like the bad guy. The two groups also think that the other group is better off and have more power in the community than they do. For example the black men thought the reason the Jewish man that killed the boy was not convicted of murder was because the Jews controlled the case and set the man free. The two groups will not be able to get along and solve their differences if they do not learn the others beliefs and traditions. Without learning about one another they will not have any respect for one another, which means they will not be able to get along.
Friday, November 20, 2009
Fires in the Mirrors
My first reaction to the movie, Fires in the Mirrors, is who is telling the truth and who is lying. It was exhausting watching the Jewish citizens and the African Americans trying to prove that they were the victims and it was the other side that was the enemy. I also noticed they were trying to justify their actions during the time. For example, Anonymous Young Man #1 justified his action of beating up the Jewish man that ran over the 7-year-old black boy because he was supposedly drunk, according to him. From what we have seen, I have not been able to decide who is telling the truth or who is lying. I am thinking that neither group is telling the entire truth because it could reflect badly on their people. I believe the reason these two groups do not get along is because they know nothing about each other and they will not try to get to know each other. Looking at the facts so far, I side with the Jews. The Jews never lowered to physical abuse against the African Americans, even when the African Americans killed an innocent Jewish man who had nothing to do with the accident.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Autobiography of Malcolm X
I found it interesting how Malcolm X’s time in jail helped him see the way things were and how enjoyed his time while he was there. He spent the majority of his time in jail reading and practicing his faith. From his readings, he learned about the white mans actions and how they were keeping the blacks from reaching their potential. He took it upon himself to aware his fellow convicts (who were black) about the evils of the white man. He tried to persuade the black men that the whites are "the devil" and are brainwashing the black population.
The difference between Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. is the way they looked at the situation. Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to achieve civil rights through peace and non-violent protests. MLKJ wanted to work with the whites and he wanted to be equal. He wanted freedom and he thought there was a chance that this could happen. Malcolm X thought of the white man as the devil and his goal was too aware the black population of what was occurring under their noses. He wanted to open their eyes to see how white men were treating them. He did not think that the two races could live together peacefully.
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Sonny's Blues
The narrator did not always believe in Sonny’s dream to be a musician. He thought it was a waste of time and hated the idea of him dropping out of school to play the piano, he thought Sonny could do better. But at the end of the novel, the narrator went to see his brother play for the first time. He saw the way Sonny played and the way the crowed reacted. At that instance, the narrator realized that Sonny’s music could help who ever listened, by setting them free. The things Sonny had suffered in his life were heard through his music. Some listeners could relate to certain feelings, since most of them were suffering just as Sonny was. Others could learn from Sonny’s mistakes that caused him to suffer. The narrator realized that Sonny’s purpose in life was to play music. Sonny could have an affect on people through his music, like the narrator has an effect on his students when he teaches. Sonny’s music also gave his listeners hope, hope that their lives would be better. They live in a horrible situation, which it is difficult to escape; the music helps and prevents them from being pushed over the edge by the environment they live in. Though the music helps the listeners, it also helps Sonny keep going. Playing the piano allows him to express himself to the audience, but also allows him to release all the stress and anxiety that is bottled up in him.
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Ethics
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Langston Hughes and Claude McKay
Langston Hughes and Claude McKay were both poets during the Harlem Renaissance. They covered similar topics in some of their poems since they were both at their prime during the same time period. But both poets had different writing styles. Claude McKay wrote his poems in the sonnet form, a style similar to the way Shakespeare wrote. Writing his poems in sonnet form, proved to the white man that African Americans can be creative, artistic, and also are educated if they can have the opportunities. Though Hughes did not write his poetry in sonnet form, he used other creative styles of writing to get his points across. Both men talked about the relationships between the white and black man and how white man's treatment towards African Americans is horrible and unkind. McKay’s, To the White Fiends, is about the blacks not stooping to the white man’s level. He said they could hurt the white men like the white men have been hurting them if they wanted too, but God but them on earth for another reason, and that reason is to bring the light. In Hughes poems, Theme for English B, says he and his teacher are both part of each other, though he is black and the instructor is white. Neither one wants to be part of each other, but they are learning things from one another. But there is not way to put an end to it, it is inevitable to stop because they are around each other. His other poem, Mulatto, is also an example of the relationship between whites and blacks. Both men wanted to use their writing as a way to express what was occurring around them, but the two poets were different because of the style they used to write their poems.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Booker T. Washington
When the economy was suffering from the majority of blacks flowing into the North from the South immediately after blacks were granted their freedom, Fredrick Douglas shared his thoughts on the subject. He thought the north was not meant for such a large influx of people and was the reason why the majority of blacks could not find jobs and had to move into the poor inner cities. If they move to the South, they would easily be able to find a job working on a plantation and keep the South’s economy going. They also would be able to set the demands from their white employers, but most blacks did not like the idea of working for someone who treated their race so horribly. He also thought that staying in the South would force the idea of freedom in the South.
Booker T. Washington had similar ideas as Douglas on the subject of blacks staying in the South. Washington thought blacks could thrive in the South. Blacks would be given a better chance to succeed in the commercial world in the South, rather than in the North. He thought blacks needed to stop and reflect on the life they could have in the South before making a haste decision to move to the North. He understood the Negro race wanting to leave after gaining their freedom, but thinks it is ultimately the wrong decision. Washington mentioned African Americans needing to understand they cannot start at the top immediately after gaining their freedom. They are going to have to work hard and work hard for a while before they start moving up in society. He also advises to not look down upon labor but to dignify it and use their skills in their work and their life.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Venture Smith vs. Olaudah Equiano
Olaudah Equiano and Venture Smith were both born and raised in Western Africa before they were taken and sold as slaves. Their fathers were leaders in their tribes and the two men were very close with their families. They learned honorable traits while growing up in their tribe in Africa. Both were hard workers, which transferred over to when they were slaves. Equiano and Smith were captured at a young age and separated from their families. Equiano was taken by other Africans and sold into slavery, but he was a slave in Africa for a few years before he went to America. He was traded all around Africa and saw many parts of the country before the white man bought him. Venture Smith’s story was different from the point that he was sent off to the United States shortly after being captured, he was never owned by a fellow African. A difference between their biographies was Equiano spent more time talking about his childhood in Africa and the traditions and lifestyles in his tribe. Equiano wrote in detail about his family, their religion and beliefs, and when he was captured and sold into slavery. He talked little about being in America and summarized his life after moving to England in a few paragraphs. Smith talked more about his life in America than his life in Africa. He gave detail about his journey from when the day he arrived in Rhode Island to his life after he had bought his freedom and his family’s freedom. The beliefs and traditions Equaino learned had some importance to him because he kept them through his life. He kept his African name, rather than use the name, Gustavus Vassa, given to him by a captain. Which is different from Ventures, who used the name given to him by a white man, rather than keep the name his family gave him. Equiano’s character had not changed by the end of his story, liked Smith’s did. But they both learned to read and write, they wrote about their life and experiences to get their stories heard. Smith’s character changed as time went by when he was a slave. He first started out as a hard and trusting worker that obeyed his master. But after a few years as a slave he started to act out against his master. He started to obsess over money and objects. When he bought his freedom he started to buy slaves, he would have them work for him for a certain amount of years and then they could be free. When they would run away, he would get upset because he lost money. While Equaino stayed true to himself and his beliefs. He was never a fan of slavery, never owned any slaves when he could, and he worked hard and respected his master. But they both suffered the hardships of being separated from their families, being sent to a foreign country and forced into slavery at a young age.
Friday, August 28, 2009
Values
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
John Henry
John Henry gave hope to the African American population because he beat the white man’s steam-powered drill in a race to see who could drill through the mountain faster. After he completed the tunnel and beat the white man’s drill, he died of exhaustion. He worked hard everyday to survive. John Henry went through a lot of hardship in his life, being prosecuted by whites, stuck in slavery, and also when digging a tunnel using only a hammer. The hardship John Henry went through showed in the ballad and it inspired others to be like him and to push through when times got a tough. The similarities between John Henry and both Nas’ songs, The Message and N.Y. State of Mind is all three talk about the hardships they have to or had to endure in their life. The hardships are different between Nas and John Henry, Nas is not a slave, but for Nas and many others in similar situations had to work hard everyday in order to see the following day. Nas talked about the life in the ghetto and the rough times that came with growing up there. Nas had to protect himself from other gangs when he lived in the city, he says in N.Y. State of Mind: “Try to cock it, it wouldn’t shoot now I’m in danger.” Some people look to Nas songs for inspiration and some even want to be like him because in today’s world it is cool to some to be gangsters. But though John Henry did not need a gun to protect him, he still had to hit pieces of steel with his hammer carefully because it could lead to his or others death if not taken seriously.